🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a flawed view of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies pose an existential threat to European civilization. Yet, this argument is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge facing the EU is not societal but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Economic Gap Separating the US and Europe

The data reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere 13.5% increase for the EU. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly 50% of the world’s top fifty technology firms are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Problem

This widening disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is decidedly US-centric. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap prompts a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe stand? Experts widely concede it is essentially a two-horse race between the United States and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

Several major factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and agile system for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a true capital markets union, which caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically met with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, there are reasons for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to propose substantial change. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of sweeping reforms.

With the right policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains significant strengths: high-quality human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically boost productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now stands at a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. However, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of global economic relevance.