🔗 Share this article

Whenever a significant prize-giving event draws close, there’s always an outcry for introducing fresh award types to recognize underappreciated efforts and delight the passions of enthusiasts with niche passions.

A fellow writer previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, representing someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal stands as crucial and important of all. The demand is this: There should be a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason movie academies don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise in the world of video games, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies presently include award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types effectively encompass many game types, making space possible for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles of one title, intense tile-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Which classification works between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens excellent brain-teasers published annually without proper recognition in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

• An iconic brain-teaser wasn’t nominated completely in 2014
• Another creative title received no nominations that year
• Popular arranging title got ignored in 2021
• Just some logic titles managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, however the design in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Famous handheld logic titles stand as most engaged experiences worldwide maintaining this status for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles competing to become most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. One could readily select multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these are games that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the hard edge game development, producing among essential manifestations within interactive entertainment. Just like movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay 35 years.